CRGO Grades Explained: How Indian Transformer Buyers Should Evaluate CRGO Steel
- mukesh muke
- Jan 7
- 3 min read

Cold Rolled Grain Oriented (CRGO) steel is not bought on name alone. In India, most procurement challenges arise not because CRGO is unavailable, but because buyers struggle to correctly evaluate grade, loss performance, thickness, and suitability for application. This gap between technical specification and commercial decision-making often leads to higher losses, rejected cores, or long-term efficiency penalties.
As India’s transformer industry moves toward stricter efficiency norms and competitive tendering, understanding CRGO grades has become a necessity rather than a technical luxury.
What “CRGO Grade” Really Means
CRGO grades are primarily defined by core loss values, measured in watts per kilogram (W/kg) at standardized conditions. Lower core loss directly translates to higher transformer efficiency and lower operating costs over the transformer’s life cycle.
Globally, CRGO grades are denoted using alphanumeric classifications such as:
M3, M4, M5, M6
Hi-B, Laser Scribed (LS), Domain Refined grades
However, in the Indian market, grades are often referenced indirectly through:
Core loss values
Thickness (0.23 mm, 0.27 mm, 0.30 mm)
Application suitability (distribution vs power transformers)
This mismatch between global grade nomenclature and local buying practice is where confusion begins.
Thickness vs Core Loss: Why Both Matter
A common misconception is that thinner CRGO automatically means better performance. While thinner materials generally have lower losses, thickness alone does not define quality.
Common thicknesses used in India:
0.23 mm – Preferred for high-efficiency and star-rated transformers
0.27 mm – Widely used balance between cost and performance
0.30 mm – Older or cost-sensitive applications
Two CRGO sheets of the same thickness can still perform very differently depending on:
Grain orientation quality
Domain refinement
Coating condition
Manufacturing origin
This is why buyers increasingly evaluate CRGO based on tested loss values per kg, not just thickness or brand name.
Prime CRGO vs Secondary CRGO: Grade Evaluation Differences
Prime CRGO
Prime CRGO is mill-fresh material with:
Certified test values
Uniform coating
Consistent magnetic properties
For utility-approved or export-oriented transformers, prime CRGO is often mandatory. However, availability is limited and lead times are longer.
Secondary CRGO
Secondary CRGO includes surplus, excess, or downgraded material that may still be technically usable.
In India, secondary CRGO is widely used, but grade evaluation becomes critical. Buyers must assess:
Whether loss values sit within acceptable deviation
If coating damage affects stacking factor
Whether material is laser-treated or not
Well-classified secondary CRGO can deliver reliable performance when sourced transparently.
Why Core Loss “One Grade Up” Matters
In Indian CRGO trade, the phrase “core loss sits one grade above” is frequently used. This means the tested loss value is slightly higher than the nominal grade but still acceptable for certain applications.
For example:
A material sold as equivalent to M3 but performing closer to M4
Suitable for non-star-rated or internal-use transformers
Understanding this distinction allows buyers to optimize cost without compromising application requirements.
Laser Scribed vs Non-Laser CRGO
Laser scribed CRGO has refined magnetic domains, resulting in:
Lower hysteresis loss
Improved efficiency at operating flux density
However:
Laser-treated material is costlier
Mishandling can reduce its advantage
Not all applications require laser scribed CRGO. For many distribution transformers, properly selected non-laser grades perform adequately at lower cost.
Indian Buyer Challenges in Grade Selection
Indian transformer buyers face unique constraints:
BIS-approved supplier limitations
Inconsistent grade descriptions in the market
Pressure to reduce initial cost while meeting efficiency norms
This has made grade literacy a commercial advantage rather than a purely technical one.
Buyers who understand CRGO grades can:
Avoid overpaying for unnecessary specifications
Reduce rejection rates during core assembly
Improve long-term transformer performance
How Buyers Should Evaluate CRGO Before Purchase
A practical evaluation framework includes:
Confirming tested core loss values per kg
Matching grade suitability with transformer rating
Inspecting coating condition (especially for secondary CRGO)
Understanding stacking factor impact
Aligning material choice with tender or regulatory requirements
Relying solely on price per kg often leads to hidden efficiency costs later.
Role of Market Knowledge in CRGO Procurement
In a market where grades, availability, and pricing shift continuously, information accuracy becomes as important as material quality.
At S M Steels, we work closely with buyers to:
Clarify grade positioning
Explain realistic performance expectations
Source both prime and secondary CRGO transparently
Align material selection with application needs
Our approach focuses on technical suitability first, pricing second, ensuring buyers make informed decisions rather than reactive purchases.
Conclusion
CRGO grade selection is no longer optional knowledge for Indian transformer buyers. With tightening efficiency standards and constrained supply, understanding grades, loss behavior, and application suitability directly impacts profitability and compliance.
Buyers who invest time in grade evaluation position themselves better in a competitive and regulated market, while those relying on assumptions risk long-term operational costs.







Comments